On Wednesday, May 22, 2013, I went with my class to the New
York Historical Society. It was my first time there and it was a honestly cool
experience. Although, our trip to the MET was interesting, I feel this trip
made me feel more engaged in learning about history, specifically about WWII. A
major part of the reason as to why my experience in this exhibit was more fun
and enticing was the layout and how everything was presented. Right when I walked
in, there was a timeline wall and little table with an old radio in which a broadcast
from back then was heard, as oppose to walking into a silent and dull
atmosphere. The space of this exhibit wasn’t as spacious as the MET. However, I
think it was enough space to allow individuals to move around and it was also
due to the inward walls and architecture that is not seen in typical square
rooms. I believe this time, the space allowed people to interact with
everything they saw, instead of whispering to everyone around them. The total
atmosphere in one word would be interactive. There was always something for
guests to do, whether it was picking up a telephone and hearing a narrator
discuss history or a story, pressing buttons or even watching videos. This made
me want to keep walking through the entire exhibit with a sincere curiosity and
explore more rather than walking around just to take notes.
So I think the major thing that stuck out to me was the
Travelers aid to resemble NYC. It was an exciting sight; there was a Statue of
Liberty, bright flickering lights with one that stated, “cocktails”, and there
was also the wonder wheel from Coney Island. It felt like home, even though we
were already in New York City. This section was something that we consider the
heart of this state. I picked up the phone and chose from the song selection
which featured, “I’ll be Seeing You” by Frank Sinatra and Tommy Dorsey
Orchestra or “Oklahoma” by Alfred Drake and chorus. Another thing that caught
my attention was the wall that was black and blue and full of boats and had a
city skyline in the background. It was about The Battle of the Atlantic and strategies
the allies used to win the war. One strategy was turning out the lights all
over the city, even from the Statue of Liberty to prevent German U-boat
captains from spotting ship silhouettes at night. Coney Island also went pitch
black. Now, imagine that! It’s pretty hard to think about this city known for
its lights turning dark; and quite scary too. One last thing that I found interesting was
the section of the exhibition which had a wall with individuals who made a
difference and made contributions throughout the war. Some people include,
President FDR, Edwin Len, Jacob Lawrence, Masako Mary Yamada and Sam Fuller. It
demonstrated how the military and navy was more integrated with people of
different ethnicities as oppose to previous wars of the past.
Before we went to the New York Historical Society, I
remember my professor mentioning that the founders of this museum wanted to
give off a positive portrayal of WWII, but it really did not sink in until my
visit was over. I kept saying, I” like this museum better”. And, I realized it
was because there wasn’t anything to dwell over or any graphic images that
presented pain or ore that would linger in my head. I think the museum made me
momentarily forget about the actual violence that is malevolent associated with
any war. The New York Historical Society definitely wanted guests to feel
supportive or just acknowledge that the time period in which the war occurred was
not a total dark time in history. I feel the exhibition we saw at the MET about
the Civil War felt as if they were just presenting facts and served as a
reality of what really happened which made people cringe; it displayed things
that maybe people don’t want to think about. On the other hand, the NYHS to me
was more celebratory, showcasing how a nation overcame a hardship. It can be
said that when we are presented information, we must take into account that
there are always two sides to the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment